Greenwashing or Genuine? Understanding Stakeholder Reactions to Corporate Climate Pledges
- Authors
-
-
Lucas J. Reinhardt
Bavaria UniversityAuthor
-
- Keywords:
- Greenwashing, Corporate Climate Pledges;, Stakeholder Reactions, ESG, Sustainability Communication
- Abstract
-
Corporate climate pledges have become widespread as firms face increasing regulatory pressure, investor scrutiny, and public expectations regarding environmental responsibility. However, stakeholders frequently question whether these pledges represent meaningful commitments or strategic greenwashing. This paper examines how stakeholders—investors, consumers, employees, and NGOs—interpret, evaluate, and respond to corporate climate pledges. Drawing on signaling theory, legitimacy theory, and stakeholder theory, the paper explores the cognitive mechanisms and contextual factors shaping stakeholder judgments. The analysis synthesizes prior empirical findings and proposes an integrative framework explaining when climate pledges enhance trust and when they trigger skepticism. The study contributes to the literature by clarifying the boundary conditions under which climate commitments are perceived as credible, providing theoretical insights for scholars and practical implications for firms aiming to build authentic environmental reputations.
- Downloads
- Published
- 2025-12-05
- Issue
- Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025)
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Copyright (c) 2025 Review of Economic & Managerial Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Allows users to: distribute and copy the article; create extracts, abstracts, and other revised versions, adaptations or derivative works of or from an article (such as a translation); include in a collective work (such as an anthology); and text or data mine the article. These uses are permitted even for commercial purposes, provided the user: gives appropriate credit to the author(s) (with a link to the formal publication through the relevant DOI); includes a link to the license; indicates if changes were made; and does not represent the author(s) as endorsing the adaptation of the article or modify the article in such a way as to damage the authors' honor or reputation.
